<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! acquires del.icio.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/yahoo-acquires-delicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/yahoo-acquires-delicious/</link>
	<description>Get to know David Kadavy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kadavy</title>
		<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/yahoo-acquires-delicious/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>kadavy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devwp.kadavy.net/?p=133#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Yeah, fling. I was shocked to noticed through Bloglines that there are quite a few people subscribed to a dead feed. I hope they all get the message.

I think the tags fit what Yahoo has been trying to do. The taxonomic directory is just too limiting and cumbersome to keep up, though, and I think folksonomic accomplishes something similar but is more natural to keep up.

I do worry though, that with the del.ico.us model, sensationalism seems to win out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, fling. I was shocked to noticed through Bloglines that there are quite a few people subscribed to a dead feed. I hope they all get the message.</p>
<p>I think the tags fit what Yahoo has been trying to do. The taxonomic directory is just too limiting and cumbersome to keep up, though, and I think folksonomic accomplishes something similar but is more natural to keep up.</p>
<p>I do worry though, that with the del.ico.us model, sensationalism seems to win out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fling93</title>
		<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/yahoo-acquires-delicious/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>fling93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devwp.kadavy.net/?p=133#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Gosh, was on your old feed. Didn&#039;t realize you were updating again. But the &quot;this feed is dead&quot; notification was neat. More people should do that.

Anyway, I&#039;m kinda confused as to why you say it makes sense. I&#039;ve always thought that tags fit the &quot;put everything in a big pile&quot; model better than the &quot;nice neat piles&quot; model.

Or do you mean it makes sense in the sense that Yahoo! is abandoning its model in favor of Google and wants to catch up?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, was on your old feed. Didn&#8217;t realize you were updating again. But the &#8220;this feed is dead&#8221; notification was neat. More people should do that.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m kinda confused as to why you say it makes sense. I&#8217;ve always thought that tags fit the &#8220;put everything in a big pile&#8221; model better than the &#8220;nice neat piles&#8221; model.</p>
<p>Or do you mean it makes sense in the sense that Yahoo! is abandoning its model in favor of Google and wants to catch up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

