<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omaha World Herald Article on Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/omaha-world-herald-article-on-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/omaha-world-herald-article-on-blogs/</link>
	<description>Get to know David Kadavy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Combs</title>
		<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/omaha-world-herald-article-on-blogs/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devwp.kadavy.net/?p=90#comment-342</guid>
		<description>DK, I hear you cluckin' big chicken.  And what about the use of blogs to convey REAL news?  I think the mainstream media is in trouble.  The internet, and more specifically Blogs, have created a way for people to get information that is not controlled by corporate interests.  A perfect example would be all of the vote fraud evidence during the past election.  Where was that in the mainstream media?  Nowhere to be found, either because the average reporter has no balls, or the corporation to which they are a slave will not allow them to display their balls.  What have you really learned from the mainstream media recently?  Anything?  I mean, their news is that these things called Blogs exist.  Well, in my best Chris Farley impression, "Whoopty Frickin' Doo!!"  I think Blogs will be a necessary weapon in the fight against the impending fascism in this country.  Dude, speaking of fascism, did you hear I got a jaywalking ticket this weekend in Lincoln?  What's up with that?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DK, I hear you cluckin&#8217; big chicken.  And what about the use of blogs to convey REAL news?  I think the mainstream media is in trouble.  The internet, and more specifically Blogs, have created a way for people to get information that is not controlled by corporate interests.  A perfect example would be all of the vote fraud evidence during the past election.  Where was that in the mainstream media?  Nowhere to be found, either because the average reporter has no balls, or the corporation to which they are a slave will not allow them to display their balls.  What have you really learned from the mainstream media recently?  Anything?  I mean, their news is that these things called Blogs exist.  Well, in my best Chris Farley impression, &#8220;Whoopty Frickin&#8217; Doo!!&#8221;  I think Blogs will be a necessary weapon in the fight against the impending fascism in this country.  Dude, speaking of fascism, did you hear I got a jaywalking ticket this weekend in Lincoln?  What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/omaha-world-herald-article-on-blogs/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devwp.kadavy.net/?p=90#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Bahahahah!  The hub, indeed.  ;)

The writer of the article sent an email to former Nebraskan Scott of &lt;a href="http://www.deadbatteries.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dead Batteries&lt;/a&gt; who used to live in Nebraska City and is now in Iowa. He said he wasn't in the area anymore but said he would forward her contact info to other Omaha area bloggers. I emailed the reporter with links to my blogs and never heard a word.  Oh well. I did manage to make it into their 80s hair article last year.  Alas, fame is fleeting.  hehe
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bahahahah!  The hub, indeed.  <img src='http://www.kadavy.net/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The writer of the article sent an email to former Nebraskan Scott of <a href="http://www.deadbatteries.net" rel="nofollow">Dead Batteries</a> who used to live in Nebraska City and is now in Iowa. He said he wasn&#8217;t in the area anymore but said he would forward her contact info to other Omaha area bloggers. I emailed the reporter with links to my blogs and never heard a word.  Oh well. I did manage to make it into their 80s hair article last year.  Alas, fame is fleeting.  hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeschmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/omaha-world-herald-article-on-blogs/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>joeschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 01:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devwp.kadavy.net/?p=90#comment-340</guid>
		<description>C.S. - did you actually read the articles he linked to in his post?  It doesn't appear that you did because the links clearly state specific examples of why blogging IS good for businesses and that Google and blogs DO go hand in hand.

Your feelings about blogs seem to be quite evident in your own website.  Your online diary certainly "looks" like a blog, but with no RSS feed to speak of.  You should change your domain name to anti-blog.com instead of misspelling the word cinnamon, you would probably get more traffic.

C.S. - Homework for tonight: Go back and read the links in David's post and research the history of google and blogs.  (Google first opened it's doors in Sept. 1998, blogger.com was founded in Aug. of 1999. I wouldn't exactly say "Google has been around long before the rise of personal publishing").

Also check out these blogs:
&lt;a href="http://www.scripting.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Scripting News&lt;/a&gt; (archives back to 1997)
&lt;a href="http://litmuse.maconstate.edu/~glucas/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dr. Gerald Lucas' blog&lt;/a&gt;(archives back to 1991)

&lt;a href="http://www.blogbusinesssummit.com/archives/2005/02/in_15_words_or_1.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blogging defined in 15 words&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href="http://redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2005/02/blogging_define.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Red Couch&lt;/a&gt;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.S. - did you actually read the articles he linked to in his post?  It doesn&#8217;t appear that you did because the links clearly state specific examples of why blogging IS good for businesses and that Google and blogs DO go hand in hand.</p>
<p>Your feelings about blogs seem to be quite evident in your own website.  Your online diary certainly &#8220;looks&#8221; like a blog, but with no RSS feed to speak of.  You should change your domain name to anti-blog.com instead of misspelling the word cinnamon, you would probably get more traffic.</p>
<p>C.S. - Homework for tonight: Go back and read the links in David&#8217;s post and research the history of google and blogs.  (Google first opened it&#8217;s doors in Sept. 1998, blogger.com was founded in Aug. of 1999. I wouldn&#8217;t exactly say &#8220;Google has been around long before the rise of personal publishing&#8221;).</p>
<p>Also check out these blogs:<br />
<a href="http://www.scripting.com/" rel="nofollow">Scripting News</a> (archives back to 1997)<br />
<a href="http://litmuse.maconstate.edu/~glucas/" rel="nofollow">Dr. Gerald Lucas&#8217; blog</a>(archives back to 1991)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogbusinesssummit.com/archives/2005/02/in_15_words_or_1.htm" rel="nofollow">Blogging defined in 15 words</a> (via <a href="http://redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2005/02/blogging_define.html" rel="nofollow">The Red Couch</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c. s.</title>
		<link>http://www.kadavy.net/blog/posts/omaha-world-herald-article-on-blogs/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>c. s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devwp.kadavy.net/?p=90#comment-339</guid>
		<description>As an Omaha native, I'm not really surprised at Omaha.com's lack of web-savvy.  As they say, all of the trends work their way from the coast to the middle of the country, and since Omaha is nearly dead center...

Blogs (dumbest word ever) do not power Google.  Google has been around long before the rise of personal publishing.  It just happened that given the way PageRank is calculated, weblogs are given more weight than they deserve.  LinkFarms were once able to prey on PageRank, too, but Google shut them down (coincidentally, this coincided with the rise in comment spam, surprise!).

One can get to the top of search engine results without the aid of weblogs.  I should know, I've done it.  All it takes is good, frequently updated information and a website that is designed properly with things like headlines and alt information for images (things that help out people, too).  Blogs just happen to do both because of how easy it is to add fresh content and default templates use good, semantic code that search engines like.

Quite frankly, weblogs for business is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.  What happened to just calling it "News" or "Press Releases"?  That's what companies *used* to call it before "Blog" became the next big buzz word that was proclaimed to fulfill all of your marketing desires.

That's the problem with people who are obsessed with blogs:  everything needs to be a blog or run by [insert blog publishing tool here] or must have [insert syndication format here].
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Omaha native, I&#8217;m not really surprised at Omaha.com&#8217;s lack of web-savvy.  As they say, all of the trends work their way from the coast to the middle of the country, and since Omaha is nearly dead center&#8230;</p>
<p>Blogs (dumbest word ever) do not power Google.  Google has been around long before the rise of personal publishing.  It just happened that given the way PageRank is calculated, weblogs are given more weight than they deserve.  LinkFarms were once able to prey on PageRank, too, but Google shut them down (coincidentally, this coincided with the rise in comment spam, surprise!).</p>
<p>One can get to the top of search engine results without the aid of weblogs.  I should know, I&#8217;ve done it.  All it takes is good, frequently updated information and a website that is designed properly with things like headlines and alt information for images (things that help out people, too).  Blogs just happen to do both because of how easy it is to add fresh content and default templates use good, semantic code that search engines like.</p>
<p>Quite frankly, weblogs for business is the dumbest thing I&#8217;ve ever heard.  What happened to just calling it &#8220;News&#8221; or &#8220;Press Releases&#8221;?  That&#8217;s what companies *used* to call it before &#8220;Blog&#8221; became the next big buzz word that was proclaimed to fulfill all of your marketing desires.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem with people who are obsessed with blogs:  everything needs to be a blog or run by [insert blog publishing tool here] or must have [insert syndication format here].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
